Your favorite nvgt games

so, I want to know what nvgt games are publicly available, so I'll ask the community itself about what games which you like, that were made with this wonderful engine?
I don't know where to put it since all of the forums are about nvgt programming specifically, so I'll put it on off topic, move if necessary :slight_smile:

1 Like

Hi,
There is this nvgt_minigames repo, and simple fighter became open source. Those are just the 2 I could think about on the spur of the moment.

Just FYI, I've moved this to the game discussion category that was being created as you were composing this topic.

ok, I can say that I'm not going to use simple fighter code any time because GPL, but it's cool that they actually made it open.

and, the example minigames has no license.

It's probably possible to talk about it with both of these developers, I think in this case the license selections were possibly made more because of not knowing the available licenses or what should be selected as opposed to being serious about leaving code unlicensed or using GPL.

1 Like

My fav NVGT game is Crazy Party if we can count it

There is also Literary's typing race and Mason's endless runner

1 Like

Hmm, what's up with GPL? I was planning to release my code under it as well at some point.

yep endless runner is ossem!

So basically there is one very, very severe problem with the GPL. If you release your code under it, it means that the only people who can use it are those who wish to also release their source code in turn. So if you just want to release a helpful geolocater class for example but it's under the gpl, I can't use it in my commercial online game because I don't want to release the code for that game as it's closed source. In other words if you release your code under GPL, you're saying "hey since I released my source code, you need to as well!" Especially for game development where people wish to keep their games closed source sometimes, I'd avoid the GPL because otherwise the helpful code you released won't actually be helpful for people due to legalities.

1 Like

Ok sorry for the offtopic, if we want to continue this, and I find it pretty interesting to learn more aobut it, we might need to create a new topic. Anyway get it. Yeah of course it depends what code, in my case, it's a File Player/set of tools I want to make OSS, but I don't want that people just go copy it and, let's overdo a bit, make iit comercial. Ofc if people want they can use, idk, my sorter script include from there, but not just continue the entire thing closed source.
That's why I think gpl is ok in this case, or is there something, well, better?

Hi.
Indeed this is true. In any case my goal wasn't to make it unusable for the people. I'm sorry for the inactivities and lagg of lizense. I'll take care of it and will open a new topic when I think I'm done.
Sorry again, and thanks notifying me.

1 Like

Hi there.
I agree, we should possibely have a topic in offtopic (maybe not even), where we'll be informated about lizenses and can discuss about them.
Not that people could google by themself, but I think it actually would be pretty helpful for people knowing not much about it.

1 Like

Yeah if you don't want people to use your code in their closed source project, then you want the GPL indeed. If you want to make a utility that is convenient for everybody to use, such as an include where you are intending to just be purely helpful and give something to everybody that they can use commercially or not, you should just be aware that the GPL does not allow for that. So it's totally fine to use it if you do not want people to use your code commercially so long as you know the effect. It's just that some people don't care if their code is used commercially and end up using GPL anyway, thus disallowing commercial use of that bit of code even though they didn't actually care.

Indeed beyond this we can create another topic about the various marats of different licenses, probably in the general category since it's programming related.

1 Like

Per the rules, code that has no license is assumed to be licensed under The Unlicense, which is a public domain dedication. However, if you are concerned, you can always ask the devs.
Edit: Okay, so it does now have a license, I forgot about that. Please disregard.